Consequently, the conclusions we have actually reached concerning plaintiff’s federal constitutional *807 claims are similarly relevant to its state constitutional claims.
Consequently, the conclusions we have actually reached concerning plaintiff’s federal constitutional *807 claims are similarly relevant to its state constitutional claims.
Because of its argument that is last contends that the ordinance is preempted by state legislation. This argument does not implicate any federal issue and it would be permissible to dismiss it on that ground, rather than exercise supplemental jurisdiction over it like plaintiff’s state constitutional issues. 28 U.S.C. В§ 1367(c) (3). Nevertheless, in my opinion it might advance […]
